Friday, January 20, 2012

DO UFO's BOTHER YOU

Hoping to make this a quick post I'll cut to the chase. Ever since mankind began to communicate the exchanges were pretty much intended to progress the distribution of awareness about nearly everything. For aeons the communication pertained to the local environment and was quite limited but in this age of advanced media we have witnessed a geometric explosion of not only that which is communicated but also the means by which it is passed around.

If we factor in the ways in which media has become involved in economic end games we might begin to perceive the possibility of inconsistencies in all that communication involves. This pretty neatly gets us up to the bar where the long time existent but rare sightings of unidentifiable flying objects has become a controversial topic. The controversy most likely stems from our present ability to summarize an event and get information about it distributed globally in very short order, this, juxtaposed against the inability to factually prove the existence of UFOs.

If the entirety were based on theory only, in the beginning and continued thereat, it would be a completely different situation. However, the claims by many that UFOs exist as physical realities and can be perceived by physical eyes leads to many a merry chase and perhaps, historically to some unfortunate, serious physical altercations. The point we need to deal with gets beyond opinion and arguing the obvious and that point is whether or not a global public needs forthright and timely information that is qualified by the government for which they have paid.

To date, when information regarding anything UFO is encountered it is generally not sanctioned by any government other than in a neutral and ambiguous sense. It seems to be the general consensus that UFOs are not an area of expertise that governmental bodies espouse.They prefer to keep their knowledge or opinions locked away. Fine and dandy but upon examining the reason for such censoring we find that there is a fear for the fear and panic factor which might initiate mayhem and chaos amongst such a governed body.

Now, if a thought, that something unidentifiable is going to generate a broad hysteria across a nation or planet, is capable of locking up actual factual information which may or may not exist, where do we file the daily feed about the atrocities perpetrated on those same publics? Are we expected to put the constantly inflowing accounts of murder and genocide and robbery, torture and extortion and bludgeonings in the little place where we have no fear and such information doesn't bother us?

I find the conditions between the two conflicting. It almost points out that whoever is in those UFOs must be running the media and governments as well. Does anyone know? You see, that's just it. We either have it only as rumor or don't have it because it is of secrets shared and we, generally, aren't amongst the sharers. No big deal then. Well, if we paid for it and aren't getting it does that make a difference?

Summing it up: The difference is this, if that which is UFO is actually of great significance and if you knew the truth therein this day, you would be then of a blown mind, perhaps even of a severly blown mind, then it is a case of being protected. We are being protected. Yea. But wait.. If we are being sheltered from the effects of such knowing, then how did that which is protecting us survive the ordeal of having come to know??? There must be a sea of sufferers then if we assign governments as our protectorates and assume a league of insiders who know the truth. Can that be without a definite Denver boot of overriding protectionism and isolationism governing the distribution of the actual factual concerning such?

UFOs are definitely mysterious and I think we should continue to pursue information and understanding of their apparent existence without the jeopardy of foolish moves against conventional barriers to such awares. Weigh in where you will but don't draw lines in the sand for "the times they, are a changin' " and we may very well be dealing with those changes soon.

No comments: